| | | | | | | |  Shakopee City Council October 17, 2017
|
| | | | | | | | | FROM: | Mark Noble, Senior Planner | | TO: | Mayor and Council Members, William H. Reynolds, City Administrator |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | Subject: Rezoning of Property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-1B) Zone | | |
| | | | | | | | Policy/Action Requested: Approve the Rezoning of Property from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-1B) Zone. | | |
| | | | | | | | Recommendation: Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their October 5, 2017 meeting, and recommended approval by a unanimous vote (5-0).
| | |
| | | | | | | | Discussion:
Site Information
Applicant: Prairie Meadow, LLC
Property Owner: Prairie Meadow, LLC
Location: 1395 Wood Duck Trail
Current Zoning: Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone
Adjacent Zoning: North: Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone
South: Rural Residential (RR) Zone
East: Rural Residential (RR) Zone
West: Low-Density Residential (R-1A) Zone
Comp. Plan: Single-Family Residential
Lot Size: 8.68 Acres
Introduction
Prairie Meadow, LLC has made application for a Rezoning from Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone to Urban Residential (R-1B) Zone. The subject property is generally located north of Wood Duck Trail, west of Marschall Road and south of Meadow Lane in the Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone.
The property currently is used as a single-family residence. This parcel, along with several others located south of Valley Creek Crossing 2nd Addition and north of Timber Trails, was included in a recent extension of Jennifer Lane that now connects these two (2) subdivisions, along with extended services along this new corridor. Attached to this report is a preliminary concept plan for this subdivision, a conceptual stormwater/drainage plan, and an aerial which identifies the recently approved residential subdivision just to the north (Prairie Meadows). The applicant has submitted a rezoning request for a single-family residential development, similar to the existing Prairie Meadows, and should this request be approved, will proceed with the submittal of a Plat application roughly based on the concept plan for this particular parcel. There remains one property adjacent to this request where the current property owners have no interest in pursuing additional development at this time. If in the future they would like to develop their
property, staff will work with the developer(s) on a layout that will generally be consistent with the layout shown on the conceptual stormwater/drainage plan.
Planning staff did receive comments from SPUC, whom noted that the applicant shall contact them to discuss requirements to receive water and electric service for development of this property. Also attached to this report is a letter from the developer, which notes comments that were raised at their neighborhood meeting.
The developer’s concept plan identifies parcels that appear to comply with the required design standards for this zone. Detailed review of the project will occur at time of Platting, should this request be approved.
Findings - Rezoning
The criteria required for the granting of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment are listed below for the Council’s consideration.
Criteria #1 That the original Zoning Ordinance is in error;
Finding #1 The original Zoning Ordinance is not in error.
Criteria #2 That significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place;
Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. The demand for single family development in this area of the city has increased. Combined with the fact that street and utility improvements have occurred in this area, development consistent with what is proposed is appropriate.
Criteria #3 That significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred; or
Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have occurred. What once was a rural residential area is now an area that is viewed as an attractive residential development area because of the location and the availability of services and street improvements. There are limited remaining parcels for single family residential within the City.
Criteria #4 That the comprehensive plan requires a different provision.
Finding #4 The Comprehensive Plan does not require a different provision. The Comprehensive plan guides this property as single family residential, which is consistent with the developer’s concept.
| | |
|